Ethnobotany and Cancer Plants
by
Ingrid Naiman
Though plants have been the primary source
of nutrition and medicine since life on Earth began, the term "ethnobotany" was
only coined in 1895. Today, it tends to refer to plant uses by
traditional societies, often those without written histories of
plant uses. In actuality, ethnobotany is rapidly becoming the primary
discipline to provide reasons for preserving rain forests, endangered
species plants, and indigenous knowledge of the medicinal value
of the plants.
For me personally, the boundaries between
medical anthropology and ethnobotany and medical history are sometimes
not distinct. A good example of how modern science and tribal culture
come face-to-face is in the efforts of cancer researchers to determine
how Amazonians shrink headsbecause if we knew what substances
they use to promote this shrinkage, we might discover herbal agents
that can be used to shrink tumors.
Another example of cross-disciplinary interests
is in the burgeoning field of zoopharmacognosy, the study of how
animals medicate themselves. À propos my own work, one of
the most promising and controversial cancer treatments, that of
the Hoxsey family, was attributed to a horse who was set free to
graze when it was discovered that the horse had cancer. When it
was observed that the horse healed, the great-grandfather of the
controversial 20th century figure developed an internal herbal
tonic from the herbs growing in the meadows where the horse had
found the cure for cancer.
Scientists who spend years acquiring the
educations necessary to perform sophisticated work in the laboratory
scoff at the notion that an illiterate individual much less an
animal could have a cure for cancer. This attitude is best summed
up in a statement by William Grigg, Public Information Officer
of the FDA:
The idea that the American Indians, or this
person or that person . . . would accidentally stumble upon some
herb that would cure (cancer) is rather farfetched. It's like
the idea that if you put three billion monkeys in room, one of
them might write a Shakespearean sonnet.
Despite
his evident wounded pride, it is apparent to all who have devoted
the necessary time to these investigations that traditional societiesand
animalshave, in fact, been successfully curing cancer.
In an almost routine survey of the literature on Podophyllum
peltatum, Jonathan L. Hartwell discovered that twenty years
before he had identified the chemical agents in podophyllin responsible
for the anticancer activity of the resin obtained from the rhizome
of the mayapple, it had been reported that the Penobscots of
Maine had used this plant to treat cancer. Then, he found that
a hundred years earlier, the resin had been recommended as a
cancer treatment in the early American materia medica and that
it was used by physicians in Mississippi in 1897.
Harvard educated Hartwell was hooked. He
poured over 5000 years of published literature, starting with the
Shen-Nung, 2828-2698 B.C., the Ebers Papyrii ca. 1550 BC, and so
on through modern times. In all, he catalogued at least 3000 references
to plants used in the treatment of cancer. These he published in
eleven volumes of Lloydia between 1967 and 1971. He retired in
1975, but James Duke picked up more or less where Hartwell left
off. He screened 35,000 plants for anticancer activity and found
3000 plants possessing some power to inhibit cancer.

While these findings are not
astonishing to botanists, herbalists, or medical anthropologists,
many scientists have been slow to accept the idea that a cure might
be found outside the laboratory. In any event, the relatively new
discipline of ethnobotany finally has a proper seat in the halls
of academia.
The fact is that none of us
would be alive today if the ways of our ancestors had not sufficed
to sustain life and viability against a host of threats to survival.
Thus, it is somewhat incredulous when we think that the fervor
of modern science has been so boldarrogantthat it almost
eradicated knowledge of the ways that had served humanity for countless
eons before the advent of the modern era.
This said, it is not difficult
to see how those who take a certain comfort in believing that smallpox
was eradicated in less than a century following acceptance of the
germ theory of disease would see a line between historic and modern,
especially if they really believe that prior to Ignaz Semmelweiss
(1818-1865), no one really understood the need for hygiene and
aseptic procedures. Speaking for myself, I certainly grew up believing
we only understood the need for washing our hands when, in the
face of enormous opposition and ridicule from erudite doctors,
Lister proved Semmelweiss correct. What perhaps neither knew is
that Iroquois medicine men already knew what science needed to
prove to its satisfaction before it could make believers of skeptics.

Many traditional methods survive
because they work. Moreover, the knowledge now sought by those
pouring through the rain forests in search of cures for what ail
mankind is a very specific kind of understanding, one based on
intimate observation of Nature and long oral traditions passed
along through apprenticeships that school people in such a way
as to preserve both knowledge but also supply of the plants needed
to make medicine.
In short, it is very different
to assume trusteeship for a plot of land in a forest and to observe
the growth cycles and life of the plants than to collect specimen,
press them between boards, and send them to a modern laboratory
for chemical analysis. Ethnobotanists have contributed greatly
to our appreciation for our natural medicine chest as well as the
individuals who have kept alive the diverse traditions of our Planet,
for the shamans, curanderas and curanderos, medicine men and women,
witchdoctors, alchemists and herbalists. Thanks to their dedication
to their tasks, we have found reasons to preserve what seemed to
facing destruction, reasons to cherish our lands and its peoples,
and reasons to turn to Nature for relief.
Copyright by Ingrid Naiman
2003

Cancer Salves:
A Botanical Approach to Treatment